Search IIA
-
Expert Exchange: Creating Community with Embedded Analytics Teams
-
Expert Exchange: Thinking About a Center of Excellence
-
Expert Exchange: Engagement Models for Reporting and Advanced Analytics
-
Federated Analytics Readiness Assessment
-
Federated Analytics: Design Objectives and Operational Commitments
In the last post, I introduced the idea of the oscillation trap: the frustrating pattern where analytics organizations swing between centralized control and distributed chaos, never quite solving the structural issues that keep teams stuck. This time, I want to go deeper into what it actually means to build a
-
Selling Federated Analytics for Resource Allocation
Federated analytics is often framed as a structural decision: Should we centralize or distribute? In our earlier blogs, we explored how to avoid the “oscillation trap” that comes from swinging between models without solving root causes, and laid out key design principles for standing up a federated analytics operating model
-
Expert Exchange: Resource Planning for a Federated Future
-
Expert Exchange: Building a Federated Analytics Operating Model
-
Inside a Federated Analytics Transformation
Following our foundational session on federated analytics operating models, join IIA CEO Jack Phillips in conversation with Keith Moody, assistant vice president of analytics at Discount Tire. Together, they’ll explore how a large legacy retailer is rethinking structure, strategy, and stakeholder alignment as it enters the early stages of federation.
-
Federated Analytics: Starting Blueprints and Transition Strategies
Over the past several weeks, I’ve written about the growing appeal—and organizational challenge—of federated analytics operating models. We started with the why: the exhausting cycle of swinging between centralized control and distributed fragmentation, and why federation offers a way out of the oscillation trap. We followed with the what: the